Current:Home > My'Violent rhetoric' targeting Colorado Supreme Court justices prompts FBI investigation -Elevate Capital Network
'Violent rhetoric' targeting Colorado Supreme Court justices prompts FBI investigation
View
Date:2025-04-16 11:14:13
Officials are investigating threats on Colorado Supreme Court justices after their decision to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential primary election, according to reports from multiple outlets.
Online posts about violence toward the justices spread rapidly in the 24 hours after the decision was announced, according to an analysis by Advance Democracy and reported by NBC News.
The state Supreme Court decided Dec. 19 that Trump's actions leading up to the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, meant that he "engaged in insurrection," disqualifying him from holding office because under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
“The FBI is aware of the situation and working with local law enforcement,” FBI spokesperson Vikki Migoya said in a statement emailed to multiple outlets. “We will vigorously pursue investigations of any threat or use of violence committed by someone who uses extremist views to justify their actions regardless of motivation.”
Migoya did not immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment.
According to CNN, the Denver Police Department responded to a justice's home Thursday after an apparent hoax report. A police spokesperson told Axios that the department is increasing patrols near justices' residences. Denver police did not immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment.
More:Supreme Court may want to avoid Trump. Colorado's ballot ruling won't let them
Report finds 'significant violent rhetoric' against justices after ruling
As first reported by NBC, public interest research nonprofit Advance Democracy found social media users posted "significant violent rhetoric" against justices and Democrats after the ruling.
"We are seeing significant violent language and threats being made against the Colorado justices and others perceived to be behind yesterday’s Colorado Supreme Court ruling," Advance Democracy president Daniel J. Jones told NBC. "The normalization of this type of violent rhetoric − and lack of remedial action by social media entities − is cause for significant concern."
A report issued by the organization and obtained by NBC outlined several messages posted on pro-Trump forums, extremist websites and Truth Social.
"What do you call 7 justices from the Colorado Supreme Court at the bottom of the ocean? A good start," one post in the report stated, according to NBC.
"Kill judges. Behead judges. Roundhouse kick a judge into the concrete," read another post.
The Colorado Judicial Branch did not immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment.
Colorado Supreme Court ruled to remove Trump from ballot over Jan. 6 actions
The Colorado high court's decision rests on justices' determination that Trump incited an insurrection when fomenting the crowd that caused a riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.
"President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president," Colorado's high court wrote in an unsigned opinion. "Because he is disqualified, it would be a wrongful act under the election code for the secretary to list him as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot."
The state Supreme Court reversed a lower court's ruling, which ruled that the 14th Amendment does not apply to the president. The 14th Amendment was passed in the post-Civil War era and bans anyone who "engaged in insurrection" from holding office.
veryGood! (8198)
Related
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Rain, flooding continue to slam Northeast: The river was at our doorstep
- Historic floodwaters begin to recede as Vermont dam stabilizes after nearing capacity
- All the Stars Who Have Weighed In on the Ozempic Craze
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Did AI write this headline?
- Aretha Franklin's handwritten will found in a couch after her 2018 death is valid, jury decides
- Cuomo’s New Climate Change Plan is Ambitious but Short on Money
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- Warming Trends: Bugs Get Counted, Meteorologists on Call and Boats That Gather Data in the Hurricane’s Eye
Ranking
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- At COP26, Youth Activists From Around the World Call Out Decades of Delay
- Kim Kardashian Reacts to Pregnant Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker’s Baby News
- Microsoft slashes 10,000 jobs, the latest in a wave of layoffs
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- These Bathroom Organizers Are So Chic, You'd Never Guess They Were From Amazon
- Rain, flooding continue to slam Northeast: The river was at our doorstep
- China's economic growth falls to 3% in 2022 but slowly reviving
Recommendation
Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
Get a First Look at Love Is Blind Season 5 and Find Out When It Premieres
A Maryland TikToker raised more than $140K for an 82-year-old Walmart worker
Mary Nichols Was the Early Favorite to Run Biden’s EPA, Before She Became a ‘Casualty’
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
3 events that will determine the fate of cryptocurrencies
Donald Trump Jr. subpoenaed for Michael Cohen legal fees trial
Al Pacino and More Famous Men Who Had Children Later in Life