Current:Home > FinanceKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Elevate Capital Network
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-25 00:10:37
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (34679)
Related
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Uber adds passengers, food orders amid omicron surge
- The Bear Teaser Reveals When Season 2 Will Open for Business
- Sephora 24-Hour Flash Sale: Take 50% Off Korres, Nudestix, Belif, and More
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Facebook, YouTube and Twitter remove disinformation targeting Ukraine
- Cyberattack on Red Cross compromised sensitive data on over 515,000 vulnerable people
- Ted Lasso Season 3 Premiere Reveals a New Heartbreak for Jason Sudeikis’ Coach Character
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Why Kim Kardashian’s New Bikini Pic Is an Optical Illusion
Ranking
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- This Treasure Map Leads Straight to the Cast of The Goonies Then and Now
- Looking good in the metaverse. Fashion brands bet on digital clothing
- Senators aim to rewrite child safety rules on social media
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- TikTok sees a surge of misleading videos that claim to show the invasion of Ukraine
- Panamanian tribe to be relocated from coastal island due to climate change: There's no other option
- A cyberattack in Albuquerque forces schools to cancel classes
Recommendation
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
Looking good in the metaverse. Fashion brands bet on digital clothing
Russia admits its own warplane accidentally bombed Russian city of Belgorod, near Ukraine border
Spotify will add a COVID advisory to podcasts after the Joe Rogan controversy
Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
Spotify removes Neil Young's music after he objects to Joe Rogan's podcast
Cycling Mikey is every bad London driver's worst nightmare
DOJ arrests New York couple and seizes $3.6 billion in bitcoin related to 2016 hack