Current:Home > NewsA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -Elevate Capital Network
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-26 07:14:26
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Here's what could happen in markets if the U.S. defaults. Hint: It won't be pretty
- The case for financial literacy education
- Cue the Fireworks, Kate Spade’s 4th of July Deals Are 75% Off
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- As the Biden Administration Eyes Wind Leases Off California’s Coast, the Port of Humboldt Sees Opportunity
- LA's housing crisis raises concerns that the Fashion District will get squeezed
- Shifting Sands: Carolina’s Outer Banks Face a Precarious Future
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Brittany Snow and Tyler Stanaland Finalize Divorce 9 Months After Breakup
Ranking
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- A brief biography of 'X,' the letter that Elon Musk has plastered everywhere
- Ricky Martin and Husband Jwan Yosef Break Up After 6 Years of Marriage
- Families scramble to find growth hormone drug as shortage drags on
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Supreme Court unanimously sides with Twitter in ISIS attack case
- Amazon Shoppers Swear By This $14 Aftershave for Smooth Summer Skin—And It Has 37,600+ 5-Star Reviews
- Do dollar store bans work?
Recommendation
'Most Whopper
Out in the Fields, Contemplating Humanity and a Parched Almond Farm
Biden Administration Opens New Public Lands and Waters to Fossil Fuel Drilling, Disappointing Environmentalists
You Won't Believe How Much Gymnast Olivia Dunne Got Paid for One Social Media Post
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Tucker Carlson says he'll take his show to Twitter
Why the Luster on Once-Vaunted ‘Smart Cities’ Is Fading
Housing dilemma in resort towns