Current:Home > StocksAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Elevate Capital Network
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-12 21:54:28
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- 'Golden Bachelor' after that proposal: Gerry and Theresa talk finale drama, 'naughty' outing
- Dying mother of Israeli hostage Noa Argamani pleads for her release
- At least 12 people are missing after heavy rain triggers a landslide and flash floods in Indonesia
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Lifetime's 'Ladies of the '80s: A Divas Christmas' has decadence, drama, an epic food fight
- Ohio Fails to Pass Restrictions on College Teaching About Climate Policies
- Blinken sees goals largely unfulfilled in Mideast trip, even as Israel pledges to protect civilians
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Red Lobster's cheap endless shrimp offer chewed into its profits
Ranking
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Semitruck failed to slow down before deadly Ohio crash, state report says
- Eddie Murphy, Tracee Ellis Ross talk 'Candy Cane Lane' and his 'ridiculous' holiday display
- More than 30 people are trapped under rubble after collapse at a mine in Zambia, minister says
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Jeremy Allen White and Rosalía Hold Hands on Dinner Date Amid Romance Rumors
- Tucker Carlson once texted he hated Trump passionately. Now he's endorsing him for president.
- 'Kevin!' From filming locations to Macaulay Culkin's age, what to know about 'Home Alone'
Recommendation
Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
Vacuum tycoon Dyson loses a libel case against a UK newspaper for a column on his support of Brexit
The resumption of the Israel-Hamas war casts long shadow over Dubai’s COP28 climate talks
As NFL reaches stretch run, here are five players who need to step up
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Lifetime's 'Ladies of the '80s: A Divas Christmas' has decadence, drama, an epic food fight
Urban Outfitters' Sale: 50% Off All Hats, Jackets & Sweaters With Cozy Vibes
At COP28, the Role of Food Systems in the Climate Crisis Will Get More Attention Than Ever